Politics

What I think everyone is nervous about is this settlement or letter of understanding with the Iranian regime. It is still the same regime, and while it might get diluted over time, our ultimate goal must be a regime change—even if it takes 10 years. If that regime cannot change, and I don't believe it will, it has to be diluted and replaced. The one thing we absolutely cannot do is give them money before they perform. If we give them any money, they are going to use it to complete their goals: 'Death to Israel and America,' which they are still chanting as we speak. They may not build the missiles or the bombs themselves, but they could simply buy a nuclear bomb if they wanted one. The trust factor is a major problem here, even if we think we can make them meet the different benchmarks this agreement likely has. My concern is that even if they sign it, it means nothing based on all past experiences of the last 50 years. America had a great relationship with the Iranian government for 200 years until this regime came in, took over, and stole it away from the Iranian people. I still have not seen how this agreement addresses what the Iranian people actually get out of it. Will they be taken care of? If the regime didn't give most of their money to support the military, the Iranian people would be very comfortable and prosperous. Instead, 60% to 70% of all oil revenue and wealth created by Iran goes to their military and proxy organizations in other countries all around the world. We cannot forget that these proxies can do their bidding for them. The regime will deny it, of course, and while we should be able to trace it, I remain deeply concerned. I hope I am wrong, but until then, my motto is going to be: VERIFY, then TRUST.

A Californian, he cares more about the people of Los Angeles, California, than those that are 3rd and 4th generational. He has a good plan to moderate immigration and homelessness. He is aware that billions of people want to come to the greatest country on Earth. He knows and appreciates what a gem Los Angeles was and could be again, as he lived it. He also doesn't need to know big-government politics to be a great mayor, as we know from many politicians that were never one before that because “common sense” will always be better than liberal politics—that is all you need. Not to mention, he knows more about the problems of Los Angeles than almost anyone; he’s living it, and losing his house to the fires and being unable to rebuild is only one. He lives in the middle of all the chaos.

He sees what the Dem’s have done and wants to change it all. He is by far the strongest candidate to bring Los Angeles, California, back to the great city it once was. Our best mayors nationwide were not career politicians. Please get out and vote today. The pollsters & exit pollsters were off by 18-30% in the last 3 elections. It’s ok to say you like one candidate, but vote for another, especially if they can help you and your family have a better life, while saving Los Angeles & California.

STEVE HILTON cares more about the people of California than those who are 3rd-4th generation. Him being a young American is good. Look at the billions of people who want to come to the greatest country on Earth. He knows and appreciates what a gem California was and could be; he also knows big government politics from his job with the Prime Minister, and the damage that uncontrolled, invasive influence can do to a nation. Look at England what used to be our biggest ally and a great military force is all but gone thanks to uncontrolled immigration.

He sees what it has done and doesn’t want it to happen here. He is by far the strongest candidate to bring California back. Our best governors were not career politicians. Please get out and vote today. The pollsters and exit pollsters were off by 18–30% in the last three elections. It’s okay to say you like one candidate but vote for another, especially if they can help you and your family have a better life while saving California.

A lot of my readers ask why I push so hard for Democratic voters to vote red in their states or vote for the conservative that’s gonna bring about change. Conservative politicians need to separate the Democratic Voter from the Leaders, they DO NOT REPRESENT THERE VOTERS Because change from 75% of them, is what their after. You have to look at the facts. The facts are that red states aren’t perfect, but they’re run better, they’re cleaner, and they have fewer problems. Blue states need that change. And it shouldn’t be about race, gender or anything else—vote for the person who’s gonna give you what you want: a safe city W/O Violence, a clean one that’s taken care of, and most importantly, one free from corruption. Right now, twenty five percent of all tax dollars are lost, (Stolen) from Federal, State, Counties, and cities to corruption, waste, and mismanagement across both red and blue states, though it’s far worse in blue states. Take Florida, Texas, and Tennessee. They have no income tax or are working on eliminating property taxes. Imagine having that in your state. Blue states tend to pile on taxes for everything you do, and have really high income taxes, which is why so many people are moving from blue to red states. If you vote in people who’ll get rid of the bad NGOs and corruption and theft, that’s a big beginning. That money can go to your neighbors who need it to survive and get help, not to fancy cars, trips, or sending it overseas to terrorists. I’m a fifty seven year Democrat, but a very conservative one fiscally. I’m a liberal when it comes to social safety nets, which is where most of them money is stolen. I believe in helping other people. We should feed and provide medical care to everybody in our country within our borders. We can easily do that if we didn’t have all this corruption. So here’s my closing question: Do you care more about hating the other party, or do you love your family and your children more than you hate President Trump?

I think Vivek will make the greatest governor Ohio has ever seen. One only needs to look at his track record to see that. Having the backing of President Trump and the federal government will only help expedite everything he wants to do for Ohioans. He is scary smart and knows how to get the job done for the voters. Lucky Ohio!

Everyone go vote Ramaswamy!

Here’s why I’m still optimistic… but not holding my breath. Look, the fact that we’re even talking about peace talks right now is genuinely good news. After months of tension, a fragile ceasefire and our Blockade, which was a great move. To all the usual back-and-forth, getting diplomats in the same room is a step forward. Trump’s team pushing for limits on Iran’s nuclear program while offering some off-ramps shows real leadership. The Iranian people deserve better than the mess they’ve been living under, and a genuine deal could finally let them breathe. That’s why we must have total regime change with the Iranian people at the table. But here’s the cynical twist you knew was coming: These talks have all the sincerity of a used car salesman promising “this one’s a gem.” Iran’s already signaling betrayal, denying deals on uranium stockpiles, and acting like they’re doing us a favor by showing up. The mullahs have spent decades perfecting the art of saying yes while doing the exact opposite. So while I’m rooting hard for a breakthrough that actually sticks, let’s be real — I’ll believe it when the centrifuges are in a museum and not when they’re spinning in some hidden mountain facility. The world needs this to work. The Iranian people definitely do. But regime change was always the cleaner path, and these talks feel like we’re negotiating with the arsonist while the house is still on fire. What do you think — am I too cynical, or just right? Drop a comment below.

It is becoming a very serious time for the Iranian leaders to step down. For some reason, the President is afraid to say we want regime change, even though that is what the world needs. We cannot leave these fake religious zealots who have no appreciation for human life in control. More than 80% of the citizens want a newly elected, secular government. Why don't the surrounding nations take over and gradually help the citizens? This regime spends most of its oil money on terrorism and building its military while starving its own people. Trump and Israel have the biggest hammers on the planet; they should use them until the regime surrenders to both the U.S. and its own citizens.

Having such a brave and risk-taking leader is the reason he is my hero. He knows he is risking a lot to protect us—the economy and the midterms all to protect us and the world. This is coming from a former long-term Democrat. He answers to a higher calling. That’s why the 'loony left' hates him so much; they’re jealous, so they lie all day to support leaders who don’t truly represent their moderate followers, just to give the mainstream media the soundbites they require. I have never heard one thing that the Democrats can or would do for us. Please pray for him, President Donald Trump.

This is so true. But if he succeeds, the Democrats benefit the same as all Americans. They need to start acting like Americans and enjoy the benefits of a better life for everyone. Think of all the time the Democrats waste letting President Trump occupy space in their heads. The people with 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' don’t realize how he is playing them like a fiddle. He has figured out that their hatred renders them useless when it comes to doing anything meaningful for America or offering any common-sense ideas.

If they were smarter and right now, they don’t appear to be they would support the 80/20 policies that most Americans, including Democrats, agree on. Then, they could begin to rebuild their party.

Patrick G Lockhart, CEO & Founder